Ask a Question

Walkway aesthetic QOL change recommendation.

+6 votes
121 views
in Suggestion by
edited by
The underside of the walkways don't always aesthetically align due to the design.  The walkways currently have 2 beams going one way and 1 beam going another on the underside.  This design choice does not allow for uninterrupted flow of walkway connections.  Example:  I place 2 corners next to each other to create a 180 degree turn and the bottom beams no longer line up which breaks the aesthetic.

My suggestion:  make the underside have either 1 beam both directions or 2 beams both directions.  I think 1 beam both directions would be best as it might be less geometry and also then a central beam could be added to the underside of the ramps for a complete tie in.
by (120 points)
Feel like this must have been suggested before.
I certainly agree they need some form of universal symmetry.
by (510 points)
I would have posted exactly the same had you not already suggested this. I think the underside textures need another look. Maybe even forget about beams and take a fresh approach +1

Related questions

Welcome to Satisfactory Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
In order to keep this site accessible for everybody, please write your post in english :)
August 28th update: We've removed downvotes! One major reason is because we don't want to discourage folks from posting legitimate suggestions / reports / questions with fear of being mass downvoted (which has been happening a LOT). So we now allow you to upvote what you like, or ignore what you don't. Points have also been adjusted to account for this change.
Please use the search function before posting a new question and upvote existing ones to bring more attention to them, It will help us a lot. <3
Remember to mark resolved questions as answered by clicking on the check mark located under the upvotes of each answer.
Snow Theme by Q2A Market
Powered by Question2Answer
...